<<
>>

Ссылки

Michael Arndt, ЗМ: A Lab for Growth? BusinessWeek (January 21, 2002), 50—51; and Jerry Useem, Car McNerney Reinvent GE? Fortune (August 12, 2002), 127—132.

1. Amitai Etzioni, Modern Organizations (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1964), 6.

2. John P. Kotter, What Effective General Managers Really Do, Harvard Business Review (November- December 1982), 156—167; Henry Mintzberg, The Nature of Managerial Work (New York: Harper & Row 1973).

3. Charles C. Snow and Lawrence G. Hrebiniak, Strategy, Distinctive Competence, and Organizational Per­formance, Administrative Science Quarterly 25 (1980), 317—335.

4. William C. Symonds with Rich Miller, Harvard, BusinessWeek (February 18, 2002), 72—78.

5. David L. Calfee, Get Your Mission Statement Working! Management Review (January 1993), 54—57: John A. Pearce II and Fred David, Corporate Mission Statements: The Bottom Line, Academy of Man­agement Executive 1 (1987), 109—116; and Christopher K. Bart, Sex, Lies, and Mission Statements.

Business Horizons (November—December 1997), 23—28.

6. Barbara Bartkus, Myron Glassman, and R. Bruce McAfee, Mission Statements: Are They Smoke and Mir­rors? Business Horizons (November—December 2000), 23—28.

7. Mark C. Suchman, Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches, Academy of Manage­ment Review 20, no. 3 (1995), 571—610.

8. Kurt Eichenwald, Miscues, Missteps, and the Fall of Andersen, The New York Times (May 8, 2002), C1.C4.

9. Charles Perrow, The Analysis of Goals in Complex Organizations, American Sociological Review 26 (1961), 854-866.

10. Johannes U. Stoelwinder and Martin P. Chams, The Task Field Model of Organization Analysis and De­sign, Human Relations 34 (1981), 743— 762; Anthony Raia, Managing by Objectives (Glenview: Scott, Foresman, 1974).

11. Alex Taylor III, Honda Goes Its Own Way, Fortune (July 22, 2002), 148-152.

12. Miriam Schulman, Winery with a Mission, Issues in Ethics (Spring 1996), 14—15.

13. Rachel Emma Silverman, GE Goes Back to Future, The Wall Street Journal (May 7, 2002), B1, B4.

14. Kim Cross, Does Your Team Measure Up? Business2.com (June 12, 2001), 22—28; J. Lynn Lunsford, Lean Times: With Airbus on Its Tail, Boeing is Rethinking How It Builds Planes, The Wall Street Journal (September 5, 2001), A11.

15. James D. Thompson, Organizations in Action (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967), 83—98.

16. Michael E. Porter, What Is Strategy? Harvard Business Review (November—December 1996), 61—78.

17. Michael E. Porter, Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors (New York: Free Press, 1980).

18. Louise Lee with Emily Thornton, Schwab vs. Wall Street, BusinessWeek (June 3, 2002), 64—71.

19. Andrew Park with Peter Burrows, Dell, The Conqueror, BusinessWeek (September 24, 2001), 92—102.

20. Joan Magretta, Why Business Models Matter, Harvard Business Review (May 2002), 86—92.

21. Richard Teitelbaum, The Wal-Mart of Wall Street, Fortune (October 13,1997), 128-130.

22. Michael E. Porter, Strategy and the Internet, Harvard Business Review (March 2001), 63—78; and Ma­gretta, Why Business Models Matter.

Raymond E. Miles and Charles C. Snow, Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978).

If Geraldine Fabrikant, The Paramount Team Puts Profit Over Splash, The New York Times (June 30, 2002), Section 3,1,15.

If Katrina Brooker, Can Procter & Gamble Change Its Culture, Protect Its Market Share, and Find the Next Tide? Fortune (April 26,1999), 146-152. David Stires, Fallen Arches, Fortune (April 29, 2002), 74—76.

1: Etzioni, Modern Organizations, 8.

Ir Etzioni, Modern Organizations, 8; Gary D. Sandefur, Efficiency in Social Service Organizations, Admini­stration and Society 14 (1983), 449-468.

Richard M.

Steers, Organizational Effectiveness: A Behavioral View (Santa Monica, Calif.: Goodyear, 1977), 51.

j' Karl E. Weick and Richard L. Daft, The Effectiveness of Interpretation Systems, in Kim S. Cameron and David A. Whetten, eds., Organizational Effectiveness: A Comparison of Multiple Models (New York: Aca­demic Press, 1982).

22 David L. Blenkhorn and Brian Gaber, The Use of 'Warm Fuzzies' to Assess Organizational Effectiveness, Journal of General Management, 21, no. 2 (Winter 1995), 40—51.

22 Steven Strasser, J.D. Eveland, Gaylord Cummins, O. Lynn Deniston, and John H. Romani, Conceptualiz­ing the Goal and Systems Models of Organizational Effectiveness—Implications for Comparative Evalua­tion Research, Journal Management Studies 18 (1981), 321—340.

2- James L. Price, The Study of Organizational Effectiveness, Sociological Quarterly 13 (1972), 3—15.

25 Lucy McCauley, ed. Unit of One: Measure Wl Matters, Fast Company (May 1999), 97.

26 Richard H. Hall and John P. Clark, An Ineffective Effectiveness Study and Some Suggestions for Future Research, Sociological Quarterly 21 (1980), 119—134; Price, The Study of Organizational Effectiveness; Perrow, Analysis of Goals.

27. George W. England, Organizational Goals and Expected Behaviors in American Managers, Academy of Management Journal 10(1967), 107—117.

23. Tracking Nortel's Progress Toward Corporate Goals, Measuring Up: Toward a Common Framework for Tracking Corporate Environmental Performance, Management Institute for Environment and Business, World Resources Institute, accessed on March 5, 2003 at

29. The discussion of the resource-based approach is based in part on Michael V. Russo and Paul A. Fouts, A Resource-Based Perspective of Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability, Academy of Management Journal 40 no. 3 (June 1997), 534—559; and Jay B. Barney, J.L. «Larry» Stempert, Loren T. Gustafson, and Yolanda Sarason, Organizational Identity Within the Strategic Management Conversation: Contributions and Assumptions, in Identity in Organizations: Building Theory through Conversations, David A.

Whetten and Paul C. Godfrey, eds. (Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publica­tions, 1998), 83-98.

40. Lucy McCauley, Measure What Matters.

41. Richard I. Priem, Is the Resource-Based 'View' a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Re­search? Academy of Management Review 26, no. 1 (2001), 22—40.

42. Chris Argyris, Integrating the Individual and the Organization (New York: Wiley, 1964); Warren G. Bennis, Changing Organizations (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966); Rensis Likert, The Human Organization (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967); Richard Beckhard, Organization Development Strategies and Models (Read­ing, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1969).

43. Cheri Ostroff and Neal Schmitt, Configurations of Organizational Effectiveness and Efficiency Academy oj Management Journal 36 (1993), 1345—1361; Peter J. Frost, Larry E Moore, Mery Reise Louis, Craig C. Lundburg, and Joanne Martin, Organizational Culture (Beverly Hills, Calif. Sage, 1985).

44. J. Barton Cunningham, Approaches to the Evaluation of Organizational Effectiveness, Academy of Man­agement Review 2 (1977), 463—474; Beckhard, Organization Development

45. Lucy McCauley, ed., Measure What Matters.

46. Eric J. Walton and Sarah Dawson, Managers' Perceptions of Criteria of Organizational Effectiveness. Journal of Management Studies 38, no. 2 (2001), 173—199.

47. Robert E. Quinn and John Rohrbaugh, A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Toward a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis, Management Science 29 (1983), 363—377.

48. Regina M. O'Neill and Robert E. Quinn, Editor's Note: Applications of the Competing Values Framework. Human Resource Management 32 (Spring 1993), 1—7.

49. Robert E. Quinn and Kim Cameron, Organizational Life Cycles and Shifting Criteria of Effectiveness: Some Preliminary Evidence, Management Science 29 (1983), 33—51.

50. Jeffrey Ball, Disciplined Pizazz: Chrysler's New Bosses Give Refresher Course on Thrift and Style, The Wall Street Journal (January 4, 2002), A1, A9.

<< | >>
Источник: Ричард Л. Дафт; пер. с англ. под ред. Э.М. Короткова; предисловие Э.М. Короткова. Теория организации: Учебник для студентов вузов, обучающихся по спе­циальности «Менеджмент организации». — М.: ЮНИТИ-ДАНА, — 736 с.. 2006

Еще по теме Ссылки:

  1. Ссылки
  2. Ссылка на сообщество
  3. Ссылки на законодательство
  4. 13. РЕКЛАМА ПО ПРИНЦИПУ «ПРИСОЕДИНЕНИЕ —ССЫЛКА»
  5. 1.1.5 Контур управления финансовым состоянием организации (по ссылке)
  6. VI Душевнобольные преступники и приюты для них. — Прирожденные преступники, смертная казнь, ссылка, заключение на неопределенное время. — Система одиночного заключения как одно из заблуждений XIX века. — Работы на воздухе в земледельческих колониях. — Привычные преступники. — Случайные преступники и злоупотребление краткосрочным лишением свободы. — Преступники по страсти, их относительная безнаказанность.
  7. Цветовая схема
  8. Реклама
  9. Заключение.
  10. 3.5. Изучение разделов курса
  11. Привлечение новых участников.
  12. Вопрос 80. Развитие институтов буржуазного уголовного права Англии
  13. Перекрестный промоушинг
  14. ЕСЛИ ВАМ ПОНРАВИЛАСЬ ЭТА КНИГА
  15. Продажа определенного товара или услуги
  16. Туристический консультант